I help businesses, founders, and growing teams figure out where AI actually pays off. Then build the part that does. 21 patents. 25 years. $2B+ in shipped product revenue.
Founders, firms, and growing companies all land in the same place: curious about AI, a little skeptical, and unsure what to actually build first. That’s not a failure. That’s the starting point.
Tools pile up. Subscriptions go unused. Nothing connects to how you actually work. The problem was never the software.
The opposite is true. Smaller teams move faster, adopt cleaner, and see results sooner. Scale is not a prerequisite.
The team signed up. Nobody adopted it. Subscriptions renew. People go back to copy and paste. The problem wasn’t the tool. Nobody figured out which tasks AI actually fit, before signing up.
A founder hears “use AI to build it.” Nobody explains which AI, for what, or in what order. Six months disappear. The product ships. Nobody wants it. The problem wasn’t the build. It was the product.
Each starts the same way. Understand where you actually are. Figure out where AI would help, and where it’s a waste. Do only the part that matters.
You know AI should be helping your business. It’s not. The work: find the two or three places in your operation where AI would actually pay off. Build it. Make sure your team uses it. By the end of an engagement, real AI is doing real work inside your business.
Start hereYou have an idea. You’re not technical. You don’t know what to build first, what’s worth building at all, or how to use AI to get there cheaper and faster. Most non-technical founders waste months on the wrong product. The work starts by figuring out the right one.
Start hereSenior strategic judgment without the full-time hire. For companies making big AI and product decisions. What to build. What to skip. What to do first. Drawing on 25 years of product leadership, 21 patents, and 20+ products shipped.
Start herePractical sessions on what AI can and can’t do, which tools match which tasks, and how to build habits that stick. For teams that are skeptical, busy, and tired of buzzwords.
Start hereDeciding what to build, when to build it, and what to leave on the table. The featured cases sit across robotic surgery, autonomous vehicles, and venture capital. Different industries, different decades, same kind of call.
The ION platform was being built toward two possible customers. Not two variations of the same customer—two fundamentally different users with different workflows, different clinical paths, and different economics.
Choosing wrong meant designing for the wrong person. It meant clinical trials pointed in the wrong direction. It meant the platform reached market late, or not at all.
I led the work to resolve it. The answer was clear. The team moved.
Self-driving was state-of-the-art and largely unproven. Many companies chased every feature simultaneously. Many ran out of money—not because the technology failed, but because they ran like university labs instead of businesses.
I pushed scope reduction. Intentionally delayed or removed the technically difficult work to accelerate what mattered. Reduced risk where I could. Built toward a sustainable business, not a demo.
Two patents shipped. One later adopted by Waymo’s vehicle systems.
Mighty Capital is a small Bay Area VC firm competing for the same deals as firms with several times the headcount. The mandate: build the operational leverage to match without adding people.
I architected and built an AI-first operating system across the firm. Sourcing scaled from 50 outreach touches per day to 500. Bespoke briefing systems convinced in-demand founders to sign with the firm over much larger competitors. 50+ agents and assistants gave partners hours back per day, and turned diligence and board prep from scramble into confidence.
The team didn’t grow. The capacity did.
Most AI consultants haven’t shipped a product. I’ve shipped over twenty, totaling more than $2B in revenue across companies. I hold 21 patents across medical devices, product systems, and AI. That’s twenty-five years figuring out what survives contact with reality, and what looks good in a pitch deck but dies in production.
That changes the work. I’m not designing a demo. I’m designing what your team will actually use, or what your investors will actually back. The behavioral-economics lens matters here. What people will adopt. What they’ll ignore. What looks good in a meeting and dies in production.
As a Partner at a VC firm, I reviewed over 2,000 companies and learned what separates products that win from products that don’t. I also built one of the first AI-first VC firms. Small team. Big-firm performance. Deals won.
AI consultants build. AI strategists decide. I do both. Same pattern across roles and twenty-five years. Chief Product & AI Officer. Head of Product at a startup acquired by Apple. Partner at a VC firm. Now Fractional Chief Product & AI Officer.
A few recent recommendations from people I’ve built, shipped, and figured things out with. More on LinkedIn.
Fifteen years across medical devices, autonomous vehicles, mental health AI, venture capital, sleep technology, PropTech, and legal services. The featured case studies above are examples, not the full list.
Fifteen minutes is enough to see what’s possible and where to focus. No deck. No pitch. Just a real conversation. Pick a time that works.